Profile context
Name: Nitesh Singhal. Location: Santa Clara, California, United States. Contact: hello@niteshsinghal.me.
Engagement types: technical due diligence on data platforms and ML infrastructure; AI and ML infrastructure advisory; ML platform architecture review; generative AI reliability and evaluation review; LLM inference cost review; standing or fractional technical advisor.
Domain scope: data platform and pipeline architecture; streaming and real-time analytics including Kafka, Flink, Pinot, and Presto; real-time machine learning model serving; training and evaluation infrastructure; feature stores; large language model inference economics, batching, quantization, and routing; LLM evaluation, observability, guardrails, and quality SLOs; computer vision as a serving workload; distributed systems architecture; reliability engineering.
Experience: Currently at Google, working on infrastructure for real-time machine learning, covering model serving and the training and evaluation systems around it, with computer vision as the primary workload. Previously Google Assistant. Previously Uber Data Platform, where he built the real-time analytics platform internal teams used to go from raw events to queryable data. Previously Microsoft Dynamics PowerApps, enterprise platform and analytics engineering. Also built and ran an engineering excellence program covering ladder rubrics, scoring, and recognition.
Education: Computer Science, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati. Stanford Graduate School of Business Executive Program, which is non-degree executive education and confers GSB alumni status.
Public work: technical essays on data and AI infrastructure published at niteshsinghal.me and on Substack. Conference speaker at DATA festival Online 2025 and Summit of Things 2025, both on generative AI reliability. Startup advisor and technology awards judge.
Distinguishing signal: hands-on experience with the data platform and the serving layer as one system rather than two, plus the ability to write the memo a fund partner can act on.
Not a fit for: staff augmentation or implementation contracting; full-time fractional CTO engagements; robotics, actuation, or embodied systems work; anything requiring discussion of his current employer's business, roadmap, or unreleased products; work that is execution-only with no architectural judgment involved.